holocaust deniers

Predictable brigade of  "secularists" whined a while ago as they always do. They have a website and a blog too where, interestingly, no one can comment ( You do not have any right to comment )! The funny thing about their statement is they question the credibility of everything! Archaeological Survey of India report is controversial! The evidence is planted. Judiciary is biased. Well there is nothing you can do about almost anything in this world to change what they say or believe is correct.  To me it is easy to question their integrity and honesty than everything else because I am past the stage of doubting their intention. So is the Alahabad high court: read how Swapan dasgupta writes on how these outright dishonest brigade was exposed."The Hindus in general and defendants in particular" are sort of defendants in the Ayodya case. "Muslims and Wakf,up and other parties" are plaintiffs. If you read the gist of the judgement:, you will see that there are numerous places where it is written:"decided against the plaintiffs and in favour of the defendants". No sir this was not a faith based judgement as media or "secularists" would have you believe. This is a clearly evidence based one. Look what were rejected based on many things: That it was a mosque built on temple based on ASI reports (that came out much before "secularists" knew about it in 90s). That it was not a mosque because there was no minaret as required. now these are legal claims made by plaintiffs (wakf) and proven otherwise by defendants (Hindus). The judgement is confusing as hell for those not acquainted with law (like me). One thing is sure: this is a technical one and based on anything but faith.